What Parameters Need to Review in the Report of Arc Flash Study?

What Parameters Need to Review in the Report of Arc Flash Study?
Arc Flash Study System Studies & Simulations

What Parameters Need to Review in the Report of Arc Flash Study?

As a technical reviewer of an Arc Flash Study report, your role is crucial in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the study’s findings. Here are the key technical parameters you should thoroughly assess in the report:


1. Protective Device Coordination:

Analyze the protective device coordination settings, such as long-time, short-time, and instantaneous trip settings for circuit breakers, and time multiplier settings for relays. Review the Time-Current Curves (TCCs) to ensure they are correctly plotted, considering device characteristics and coordination intervals. Verify the use of time grading and zone-selective interlocking schemes for enhanced coordination.

2. Incident Energy Analysis:

Scrutinize the method used for incident energy analysis, which involves complex calculations based on available fault currents, protective device settings, and equipment characteristics. Verify the use of appropriate arc flash equations, such as the Lee method or the Paukert method, and ensure that incident energy calculations account for both open-air and enclosure scenarios.

3. Arc Flash Hazard Boundary:

Verify that the arc flash hazard boundary is accurately determined based on incident energy levels and that it complies with safety standards, such as NFPA 70E. The boundary defines the distance from the potential arc point within which the incident energy exceeds a safe threshold, requiring specific levels of PPE for personnel protection.

4. PPE Recommendations:

Evaluate the proposed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) recommendations, specifying arc-rated clothing and equipment suitable for the calculated incident energy levels. Ensure that the report includes information on arc flash boundary distance and the required PPE for each hazard risk category (HRC) as defined by NFPA 70E.

5. Data Collection and Assumptions:

Thoroughly review the data collection process, including gathering equipment specifications, short-circuit and coordination study results, and protective device characteristics. Verify that fault current values are based on actual field measurements or accurate system modeling. Assess the validity of any assumptions made during the study.

6. Modeling and Simulation:

Assess the accuracy of the software used for system modeling and fault simulations. Verify that the software accounts for complex system topologies, transformer impedance, cable and conductor characteristics, and other factors relevant to the arc flash analysis. Ensure the simulation results align with expected real-world behavior.

7. Sensitivity Analysis:

Evaluate whether the study includes sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of variations in key parameters, such as fault currents, protective device settings, and system impedance. Verify that the sensitivity analysis addresses worst-case scenarios and identifies critical factors affecting the study’s outcomes.

8. Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies:

Scrutinize the proposed recommendations, such as installing arc-resistant equipment, adjusting protective device settings, or implementing remote racking solutions. Evaluate the effectiveness of each mitigation strategy in reducing arc flash hazards and promoting worker safety.

9. Reference Standards and Codes:

Ensure the study adheres to relevant electrical safety standards, such as IEEE 1584, IEC 61482, and any applicable local regulations. Verify that the report justifies any deviations from the standards and provides adequate reasoning based on engineering judgment.

9. Clear and Precise Reporting:

Review the report’s technical language, including the description of methodologies, analysis procedures, and results. Ensure that the report provides detailed information on equipment data, calculation steps, and assumptions, enabling other technical experts to verify and replicate the study’s findings.

10. Engineering Qualifications:

Assess the qualifications and expertise of the study team conducting the arc flash analysis. Verify their experience in power systems engineering, arc flash studies, and familiarity with relevant standards and best practices.


By meticulously examining these technical parameters, you can provide a comprehensive review of the Arc Flash Study report, ensuring its accuracy, reliability, and adherence to industry standards for electrical safety.



Enquire Now

    This will close in 0 seconds

    Enquire Now

      This will close in 0 seconds


        This will close in 0 seconds

        Enquire Now

          This will close in 0 seconds

          Enquire Now last

            This will close in 0 seconds

            Cookie Consent Banner by Real Cookie Banner